June 15, 2007

NAC is Good for Sex?

Ummm, I don't think so, but Google thinks I do... check it out.

(And no, I wasn't googling for it, it showed up as a source on my stats page. So somebody thinks it is... Cisco? Microsoft? Hoff? Shimel? Somebody better 'fess up.)

Jun 15, 2007 4:26:54 PM

1 Comment

ashimmy

Pete - I'll never tell!

Posted by: ashimmy | June 15, 2007 at 05:44 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Undercover Exploits and Vulnerabilities I am trying to keep this updated, but life intervenes. Please let me know if I've missed some (browser/office vulns?). Note the animated cursor bug in April '07 does not fit the definition. 19 total since 1988. Latest Additions: 4/5/07 - DNS RPC Vuln (confirmed by Bill O'Malley who also discovered it) Old List: 11/3/06 - XMLHTTP 4.0 ActiveX Control 9/23/06 - cPanel (credit: Dave via Adam, Ilja) 9/19/06 - Internet Explorer VML (public info) 9/3/06 - MS Word 0Day (Symantec) 8/16/06 - Ichitaro (Symantec) 7/11/06 - Powerpoint 0day. (public information) 12/29/05 - WMF. (public information) 2/7/05 - Mailman directory...
PREVIOUS POST
Lower bound for information asset value - an Economist's perspective In yesterday's Wall Street Journal, Harvard Economist Robert Barro provides a commentary* that compares Bill Gates' contribution to society through Microsoft to his philanthropic efforts. A key excerpt: "Suppose that a copy of a new version of Windows sells for $50 (and is typically charged as part of the price of a personal computer). Microsoft's revenue from Windows would then equal $50 multiplied by the number of copies consumers snap up. Microsoft's earnings are the revenue less production and development expenses. But that's not the social value. That comes from the increase in productivity created when businesses and households use...

I'm a guy with some ideas and opinions.

The Typepad Team

Search

Recent Comments